Equity raising really lowered the bar for you

Used to have big stakes in venture raised scoffed at:

Poor quality, characteristic is not, and cannot afford to lose, it's not their game!

The comment above is certainly some truth in that, but in fact it seems to move in another direction. From a global perspective, equity raising transactions is developing an annual growth rate of three times--although the stakes raised base relative to the claims raised by the audience base is much smaller.

Judging from the equity raise core, the so-called "revolution" in fact, few of us are – I'm sorry even claiming to be a "revolution"?

(Because) the more number of people attending; Moschino for Note 4

(A) participation reduces the amount of individual needs.

Over the years, mention of "crowdsourcing" (crowd-sourcing), "Internet", "decentralization" fashionable concept, people generally can agree on is:

Lower threshold, disintermediation.

But in fact it? And contrary to popular perception, counterintuitive:

Now equity raise is likely, in turn, actually raising the bar.

1. good quality projects would have been robbed

For now, all global equity to raise the platform itself is just a "match engine"-exactly, is "not completely match engine". It is clear that not all projects are on a raised platform. We all see is that currently in stock all the items on the raised platform universal or not of high quality, either do not apply to the venture capital model.

The project a high proportion of poor, means seeing the project reduce--the possibility of people's time and energy is limited.

Where are those high quality items? Why don't they all raised on a raised platform?

Money itself is limited, the so-called capital, in my understanding, should be

Capital = capital + skills

This is somewhat similar to this one: two confrontations, but the one thing man holding a sword, another peerless master only Willow Bough, with predictable results-the decisive factor is not the weapon itself.

If on a raised platform can raise the money, just money, other contributions from shareholders or even negligible, so, good project choice does not care about the money.

Conversely, anyone who thinks they're useless? Then, out of the money of shareholders to "contribution"-often the kiss but did not know, so some good projects to avoid these shareholders ' money ... ... Moschino N4 case

Occasionally there are also all the raised platform intentionally packed out "best project"-the lead investor on a variety of high ... ... Then problem came again, in the absence of third party civil cases, how to raise participants believe that lead investor's valuation is a valuation of their own investments?

It is no secret:

Lead investor is getting a valuation; placed on raised platforms in the project valuation is a valuation that has premium ... ...

So, to all the participants raise, raise the threshold--actually himself has no bargaining power.

2. noise in the market more

Democratic politics is the least bad system;--

In make-or in the business world, democracy is not much used, even more harm than good.

Crowdsourcing is an irresistible trend, since the media voice of penetrating more and more ... ... These are good things, but this does not automatically improve the ability of individuals--some individuals (certainly very few) capacity was strengthened by environment ... ...

So, this can only mean that--

Noise in the market for more.

In addition, professional investment institutions and not set in stone, on the contrary, they are more likely at a rapid pace. They sound more penetrating than the past, they are now more skilled than in the past about various means of market opinion.

So, from this point of view, all the participants not only benefit raised, but be more interference.

3. insights more valuable

In an era of more easy to talk, thinking often rare and more valuable.

Generally, if a reflection results were values to a certain extent, they begin to have direct price and when the price reaches a certain level, sharing does not bring happiness--this is not selfish or even fair, because if you think about not being rewarded, and things will go wrong.

Therefore, the insights are said out of the, often because:

A, it has been verified in make-or world;

B, the thinker has benefited until we can justifiably share ... ...

Investment on this matter, to stare at other people's actions never make excellent decisions.

This is a great value independent thinking, as well as huge areas of high risk.

So, once again, for all the participants raise equity raised its own development did not bring any advantage, on the contrary, become relatively weaker--with or without raised platform, increasingly high value can only be independent thinking.

In fact, raised platform for the development of the platform itself, to raise funds for projects, always more good than harm; equity raising of the participants, but are keenly aware, he did not participate in such a "revolution" to gain an advantage out of thin air, that's the point.

101 votes

New millet is enhanced version of the box 3

Millet is enhanced version of the box is the first 4K hyper-clarity HD IP set-top box is 1080p 4 times, quad-core CPU, 6+2 core graphics processor smaller meter boxes, 2GB memory performance up to 3 times, turned TV game machine, supports the latest 802.11ac online look more smooth and stable WiFi protocol, download faster, powerful local video playback capabilities, you can plug in a removable drive or Micro-SD card.

View details of the voting >>